November 1, 2006 Update
The following brief update is being posted in keeping with
Duke Medicine's ongoing commitment to patient safety and to
keep the public informed by providing periodic updates to this
Web site.
November 1, 2006 Update
Statement issued July 13, 2006
This statement was issued to reporters who requested comment
from Duke University Health System regarding the lawsuit filed
against Duke in Durham Superior Court on July 13, 2006.

Statement
on July 13, 2006
[11 KB PDF
file]
Public statement September 21, 2005
On September 21, plaintiffs’ attorneys released results of
an analysis they had had conducted on the bulk hydraulic fluid.
Duke released the following statement the same day, clarifying
that patients were not exposed to bulk hydraulic fluid, but to
any residual material left on the surgical instruments after
they had been washed, rinsed, and sterilized in a
multi-step process.

Statement on Analysis Report Sept. 21, 2005
[10 KB PDF
file]
Patient letter August 3, 2005
A letter to patients from Dr. Michael Cuffe, vice president
for medical affairs at Duke University Health System. The
letter assures patients of Duke's ongoing commitment to provide
information and resources regarding issues related to the
hydraulic fluid incident, provides answers to frequently asked
questions, and informs patients of how they can access future
updates.

Patient Letter August 3, 2005
[67 KB PDF
file]
Duke Health Raleigh Hospital patient letter June 27, 2005 -
Revised
(Note: A similar letter was sent to Durham Regional Hospital
patients)
A letter to patients from Dr. Victor Dzau, president and
CEO of Duke
University Health System, and James Knight, CEO of Duke Health Raleigh
Hospital. The letter shares the findings of a second external
study done by scientists at RTI International in Research
Triangle Park. RTI conducted an analysis to determine how much
hydraulic fluid remained on surgical instruments after they had
been rinsed in very hot water and then sterilized, as was the
case in the incident at Duke Health Raleigh Hospital and Durham
Regional Hospital. Their report concluded that the residual
amount of fluid on the instruments tested was very small,
approximately 0.08 milligrams per instrument, on average. The
researchers also tested for the presence of contamination by 11
metals. With the exception of zinc, which is in one of the
additives in the original fluid and present at the expected low
level, the majority of the metals were not detectable and a few
were barely detectable using sophisticated testing equipment.
(Note: This letter, a revision of the original patient letter
dated 6/27, was sent to those patients who missed the first
mailing [due to returned mail, etc].)

DHRH Patient Letter June 27, 2005 - Revised
[21 KB PDF
file]
Duke Health Raleigh Hospital patient letter June 27,
2005
A letter to patients from Dr. Victor Dzau, president and
CEO of Duke
University Health System, and James Knight, CEO of Duke Health Raleigh
Hospital. The letter shares the findings of a second external
study done by scientists at RTI International in Research
Triangle Park. RTI conducted an analysis to determine how much
hydraulic fluid remained on surgical instruments after they had
been rinsed in very hot water and then sterilized, as was the
case in the incident at Duke Health Raleigh Hospital. Their
report concluded that the residual amount of fluid on the
instruments tested was very small, approximately 0.08
milligrams per instrument, on average. The researchers also
tested for the presence of contamination by 11 metals. With the
exception of zinc, which is in one of the additives in the
original fluid and present at the expected low level, the
majority of the metals were not detectable and a few were
barely detectable using sophisticated testing equipment.

DHRH
Patient Letter June 27, 2005
[21 KB PDF
file]
Durham Regional Hospital patient letter June 27, 2005
A letter to patients from Dr. Victor Dzau, president and
CEO of Duke
University Health System, and David McQuaid, CEO of Durham Regional
Hospital. The letter shares the findings of a second external
study done by scientists at RTI International in Research
Triangle Park. RTI conducted an analysis to determine how much
hydraulic fluid remained on surgical instruments after they had
been rinsed in very hot water and then sterilized, as was the
case in the incident at Durham Regional Hospital. Their report
concluded that the residual amount of fluid on the instruments
tested was very small, approximately 0.08 milligrams per
instrument, on average. The researchers also tested for the
presence of contamination by 11 metals. With the exception of
zinc, which is in one of the additives in the original fluid
and present at the expected low level, the majority of the
metals were not detectable and a few were barely detectable
using sophisticated testing equipment.

DRH
Patient Letter June 27, 2005
[22 KB PDF
file]
Duke Health Raleigh Hospital patient letter June 20,
2005
A letter to patients from Dr. Victor Dzau, president and
CEO of Duke
University Health System, and James Knight, CEO of Duke Health Raleigh
Hospital. The letter shares information from the final report
of Professor William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH, director of the
Statewide Program in Infection Control and Epidemiology at the
UNC School of Medicine. Dr. Rutala and his team of scientists
investigated whether hydraulic fluid applied to surgical
instruments made the sterilization process less effective. Dr.
Rutala and his team recreated the situation and concluded the
sterilization of the instruments was fully effective.

DHRH
Patient Letter June 20, 2005
[20 KB PDF
file]
Durham Regional Hospital patient letter June 20, 2005
A letter to patients from Dr. Victor Dzau president and
CEO of Duke
University Health System, and David McQuaid, CEO of Durham Regional
Hospital. The letter shares information from the final report
of Professor William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH, director of the
Statewide Program in Infection Control and Epidemiology at the
UNC School of Medicine. Dr. Rutala and his team of scientists
investigated whether hydraulic fluid applied to surgical
instruments made the sterilization process less effective. Dr.
Rutala and his team recreated the situation and concluded the
sterilization of the instruments was fully effective.

DRH
Patient Letter June 20, 2005
[24 KB PDF
file]
Dzau memo June 15, 2005
A memorandum to the Duke Medicine community from Dr. Victor
Dzau, president and CEO of Duke University
Health System about the incident in fall 2004 in which surgical
tools at two Duke-affiliated hospitals were accidentally washed
with hydraulic fluid prior to being sterilized. A modified
version of this memorandum was sent to all of the patients who
were operated on during November and December 2004 at Durham
Regional and Duke Health Raleigh Hospitals.

Dzau Memo June
15, 2005
[20 KB PDF
file]
Duke Health Raleigh Hospital patient letter January 4,
2005
A letter to patients from James Knight, CEO of Duke Health Raleigh
Hospital. The letter informs patients of the problem identified
in the cleaning process of surgical instruments and asks them
to contact the hospital’s Chief Medical Officer with questions
and concerns.

DHRH
Patient Letter January 4, 2005
[12 KB PDF
file]
Durham Regional Hospital patient letter January 4,
2005
A letter to patients from David McQuaid, CEO of Durham Regional
Hospital. The letter informs patients of the problem identified
in the cleaning process of surgical instruments and asks them
to contact the hospital’s Chief Medical Officer with questions
and concerns.

DRH
Patient Letter January 4, 2005
[11 KB PDF
file]